Science & Technology

Cut-throat academia leads to ‘natural selection of bad science’, claims study

Via The Guardian

Scientists incentivised to publish surprising results frequently in major journals, despite risk that such findings are likely to be wrong, suggests research

The study’s authors say that while academics are rewarded for publishing novel work often and in high-profile journals, bad scientific practice will “run rampant”.

Getting stuff right is normally regarded as science?s central aim. But a new analysis has raised the existential spectre that universities, laboratory chiefs and academic journals are contributing to the “natural selection of bad science”.

Read entire article

Previous ArticleNext Article

1 Comment

  1. there’s something wrong about “natural selection” as a term. natural means it happens accidentally or by the laws of nature & selection says it’s designed. oxymoron?! which is it? naturally occurring without a creator or design or designed by something, someone?

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Send this to a friend

By continuing to use this website I accept the use of cookies. More information

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we'll assume that you are happy to receive all cookies from this website. If you would like to change your preferences you may do so by following the instructions here